We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is the Discovery Rule?

Jessica Ellis
By
Updated Feb 20, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGeek is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGeek, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The discovery rule is a common law doctrine that often applies to cases in which a statute of limitations is involved. A statute of limitations is a set period of time in which a lawsuit is considered reasonable; once beyond this set period of, a party that wants to sue may have no legal recourse. The discover rule suggests that the statute of limitations begins, not at the time of the unlawful event, but rather from the time that the suing party became aware of the breech. The discovery rule is unevenly applied, and may be discarded by judges who disagree with the claim.

This rule is important because unlawful acts do not always have immediately known or foreseeable consequences. If a worker is unknowingly exposed to harmful chemicals, leading him or her to develop a serious medical disease ten years later, the discovery rule suggests that the statute of limitations on suing a negligent employer would begin when the illness was first detected, not at the time of the unwitting exposure. Medical cases such as this frequently employ this rule to call for an adjustment of the statutes of limitations on issues such as malpractice or employer negligence.

One critical factor in the success of invoking the discovery rule is due diligence on the behalf of the injured party. If, in the example above, the worker had consistent symptoms throughout the ten year period, but did not get medical attention until the ten year mark, a judge could decide that the worker had not shown due diligence. This is one of the issues that makes the application of the discovery rule somewhat subjective, as it is up to the individual judge to decide what the injured party could or should have known.

Traditionally, the discovery rule has not applied to mass media libel cases. This means if a person insults someone in a published book, the statutes of limitation for a libel case generally apply, even if the injured party does not find out about the book for many years. The justification for this is that the book was publicly available and at any time open to discovery. In recent years, this exclusion has been challenged by the massive use of the Internet. Critics of mass media exclusion suggest that, while public, libel on a blog or personal website may be nearly impossible to find unless a plaintiff knows exactly the right search terms to use.

WiseGeek is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Jessica Ellis
By Jessica Ellis
With a B.A. in theater from UCLA and a graduate degree in screenwriting from the American Film Institute, Jessica Ellis brings a unique perspective to her work as a writer for WiseGeek. While passionate about drama and film, Jessica enjoys learning and writing about a wide range of topics, creating content that is both informative and engaging for readers.
Discussion Comments
By Fa5t3r — On Jun 01, 2013

Just want to quickly point out that this is something different from what's known as the "discovery law" in the United States.

The discovery law is related to how and what lawyers have to share with each other before a case begins and refers to the discovery of information, rather than the discovery of the wrongdoing itself.

By irontoenail — On Jun 01, 2013

@MrsPramm - I'd say it was one of the reasons that that case wasn't ever going to be an open and shut one and why many others aren't either. The judge could have easily ruled that the people should have known that something was wrong.

The same thing can happen in fraud cases, unfortunately, where people are penalized for not taking due diligence with their own money.

It's a hard thing to call, I think, because even if someone was being completely foolish and you might even say they "deserved" to be grifted, someone else was still breaking the law when they took advantage of that fact.

By MrsPramm — On May 31, 2013

I guess the case that most people are familiar with that involves this rule is the one made famous in the film "Erin Brockovich". Because the chemicals that were used and which contaminated the ground water in that film had been stored in the 1950s and 1960s, so without the discovery rule it might have meant that the company was safe from a lawsuit.

Of course, it is complicated in that kind of case, because you might argue that they were continuing to harm people by not informing them of the danger, which was happening up to the time of the lawsuit (in fact they were actively covering up the danger).

Jessica Ellis
Jessica Ellis
With a B.A. in theater from UCLA and a graduate degree in screenwriting from the American Film Institute, Jessica Ellis...
Learn more
WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.