We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is the 25th Amendment to the US Constitution?

Tricia Christensen
Updated Feb 07, 2024
Our promise to you
WiseGeek is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At WiseGeek, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The story behind the 25th Amendment to the US Constitution begins with one of the saddest chapters in American history, the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963. The amendment was also influenced by the increasing capacity of medical technology. The situation raised the question of what the country would do if a president were in a coma, or in some other way alive, but incapable of fulfilling his duties. It addresses the actions that would be taken if the country needed to quickly replace a president who was not able to act.

It had always been clear that the vice president would assume the presidency if the president died in office. The speaker of the house and the president pro tempore of the Senate are next in line to take over if something happens to both the president and the vice president. The situation is less clear on the rights of the vice president if the president did not die, but could not serve. Furthermore, the law was not clear about what to do if the vice president died in office, and if the president could appoint someone to take over the position.

The 25th Amendment granted certain powers to the President of the United States, and to the chief officers of the executive branch, in addition to balancing power by giving deciding rights to the legislative branch (Congress). First off, if a vice president was incapacitated or died in office, the president had a right to appoint someone new to the office who would be confirmed by a voting majority in the Senate and the House of Representatives. It also made clear and implicit that the vice president was the natural successor to the president, and when taking office, he or she has the right to appoint a new vice president, who also must be confirmed by House and Senate. The president can, moreover, submit to Congress that he or she is unable to faithfully discharge his duties and resign from office, handing the presidency to the vice president.

The last section of the amendment also grants the vice president and Congress, or a majority of chief executives in the cabinet, the ability to remove a president from office if he or she is in some way incapable of fulfilling the job. The vice president and chief executives must submit a request to have the President of the United States removed from office, and both Senate and the House must vote on the measure. The president can only be removed if both the Senate and the House approve the request by a two-thirds majority.

Much has been made of this last section, mainly on a fictional basis. Movies like Air Force One and television shows like 24 and The West Wing have explored this fourth clause from a variety of angles for dramatic purpose. There have been few instances where this clause has ever even been considered, and no instances where it has actually been employed. President Richard Nixon used the provisions in the contained in the third section of the 25th Amendment to step down from office with his resignation.

What can be said of the amendment is that it aims to address emergency situations where a president might need to be removed from office. It also makes clear how someone taking over for the president is allowed to choose his or her successor. Though it’s a useful amendment, it’s not exactly one that the government or the American people would wish to see used.

WiseGeek is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Link to Sources
Tricia Christensen
By Tricia Christensen
With a Literature degree from Sonoma State University and years of experience as a WiseGeek contributor, Tricia Christensen is based in Northern California and brings a wealth of knowledge and passion to her writing. Her wide-ranging interests include reading, writing, medicine, art, film, history, politics, ethics, and religion, all of which she incorporates into her informative articles. Tricia is currently working on her first novel.
Discussion Comments
By umbra21 — On Nov 22, 2012
@Ana1234 - Not to be unromantic, but the most painful thing to me would be the fact that the vice president would be elevated to president if something happens.

I'm not necessarily talking about the current vice president, now, but in general, almost every vice president these days is chosen to appeal to voters, rather than on skill. They are chosen to appeal to whoever isn't tickled by the choice of president on offer.

Which is fine in theory, but in practice it means we could potentially end up with eye candy in the oval office one day. And that scares me.

By Ana1234 — On Nov 21, 2012

This is a pretty good 25th amendment explanation. I can see why these rules could be used for drama on television. The first thing that sprang to my mind when thinking about how the president might be unable to fulfill duties but still be alive, is that he or she might be kidnapped (unlikely, I know) but there are probably all kinds of other scenarios that might happen.

I just hope none of them do, because in spite of the fact that people always complain about the current president, I'm sure it would be very painful to have to use any of these rules.

By anon90321 — On Jun 15, 2010

Section 4 of the 25th Amendment seems unclear to me. It states that once the VP and executive members submit in writing to President Pro Tem and Speaker of the House that POTUS is unable to fulfill his duties then the VP assume the role of acting president.

POTUS may then in writing state that he is able to perform his duties and resumes his role as POTUS unless VP and executive members state again that he is not within four days.

Senate and House then have 21 days after convening to decide if POTUS is able to discharge his duties. General thinking suggests that the language of 25th Amendment implies that VP "continues" as acting president; whereas, POTUS "resumes" his duties if Houses decide he is capable.

It seems clear that the VP continues as acting president once second letter is submitted but who is in the office during the interim between POTUS letter and second VP letter?

Does POTUS resume his duties immediately upon submission of his letter and remain in that capacity until the VP and executive members submit their second letter? or does POTUS wait four days to see if letter will be submitted during which VP is acting president?

Tricia Christensen
Tricia Christensen
With a Literature degree from Sonoma State University and years of experience as a WiseGeek contributor, Tricia...
Learn more
WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

WiseGeek, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.