What is an Audit Opinion?

Mary McMahon
Mary McMahon

An audit opinion is a professional opinion offered by a qualified accountant at the close of an audit of financial records. The opinion describes the processes used during auditing, the standards used by the auditor, and other relevant information. It indicates whether or not the auditor believes that the financial records inspected accurately represent the company's financial situation. Because auditors can be legally liable for false representations and misstatements, they are very careful when it comes to issuing a final opinion.

A woman performing an audit.
A woman performing an audit.

The best kind of audit opinion is an unqualified opinion. When this type of opinion is issued, it means that the auditor fully inspected all of the available information, was able to verify it, and endorses it. The information presented was adequate enough for the auditor to feel comfortable making a judgment endorsing its accuracy and completeness. This increases confidence in the company under investigation.

A qualified audit opinion is an opinion issued with some reservations. It is not necessarily negative, but the auditor may have had difficulty verifying information. Thus, the auditor cannot confirm that the records are scrupulously accurate. This type of opinion usually includes notes about why it is qualified so that someone reading the opinion can make a judgment about the situation independently.

A disclaimer indicates that the auditor does not have enough information to make an audit opinion. This may be because records were not provided or are incomplete. In this case, the auditor can state that the available material was audited, but there is simply not enough to issue an opinion. Disclaimers can reflect poorly on the entity being audited in addition to requiring another audit with more information so that a concrete opinion can be issued.

Finally, an adverse audit opinion is one which states that the financial records do not accurately reflect a company's financial position. This is not desired, and reflects very poorly on the company being audited. Unlike a qualified audit opinion, which may result from any number of circumstances, an adverse opinion usually suggests that something is very wrong with the company's recordkeeping, such as fraud or tampering.

Auditors want to make sure that they issue an audit opinion which is accurate. If they state that records are complete when they are not, they can be liable for the results later on down the line. Conversely, if an auditor issues an adverse opinion which damages a company's reputation and the records later turn out to be sound, the auditor's reputation suffers as well.

Mary McMahon
Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a wiseGEEK researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

You might also Like

Readers Also Love

Discussion Comments


I'm kind of glad that an auditor suffers legal penalties when they offer an incorrect opinion on a compliance audit that's positive or negative. That way, auditors don't have any incentive one way or the other, and they can offer an honest opinion.

I can imagine that if there were only penalties for offering a too favorable opinion, auditors might offer more negative opinions (even if they weren't true) just to cover themselves. But since there are penalties for giving a negative opinion of a financially sound company, this shouldn't happen.


@JessicaLynn - I'm not an auditor, but I would imagine there are many times when an auditor does an audit and feels comfortable giving an unqualified audit report opinion. I mean, why not? If you review the records to the best of your abilities and everything checks out, why not give them an unqualified opinion?

Honestly though, I almost feel bad for companies who hire outside auditors and then end up with a less than favorable opinion from the auditor. After all, I'm sure they still have to pay the auditor, no matter how the final opinion turns out.


I never realized auditors had so much responsibility and could be held legally liable if they give an auditor opinion that later turns out to be false. I think if I were an auditor, I would definitely do my job very carefully and pay close attention to detail.

I think I would probably be scared to ever issue an unqualified opinion, so I doubt I would be a very good auditor. I'm sure companies that hire people to audit their financial records are hoping to get an unqualified audit opinion to make their company look better.

Post your comments
Forgot password?