At WiseGEEK, we're committed to delivering accurate, trustworthy information. Our expert-authored content is rigorously fact-checked and sourced from credible authorities. Discover how we uphold the highest standards in providing you with reliable knowledge.
What are the Articles of Impeachment?
Mary McMahon
Mary McMahon
Articles of impeachment are formal accusations of wrongdoing lodged against a public official. Many nations allow their legislatures to impeach people such as heads of state, and lesser officials can also be impeached through legislative actions. The articles of impeachment represent a set of charges, and additional action must be taken after they are drafted for a trial to take place. Impeachment of elected officials is relatively rare in most modern governments.
The process for impeaching public officials varies, depending on the nation and the official. As a general rule, legislators in a lower house draft the articles of impeachment and then introduce them to the floor for a vote. If a majority vote is obtained, the articles of impeachment are sent to a higher house. The higher house holds a trial and votes on whether or not the elected official should be impeached. A majority vote, commonly in the form of a two thirds majority, must be obtained for the official to be removed from office.
Once impeached, a public official can still be held liable for his or her actions. For example, if the legislature votes to impeach a prime minister because she or he committed murder, the prime minister can also be tried in a court of law for the crime of murder, and may be subject to civil charges as well. Impeachment is solely a mechanism for removing elected officials from office.
The articles of impeachment clearly spell out all of the offenses the official is being charged with, and provide factual basis for the charges. While it is possible for only one article to be introduced, commonly there are several and in some impeachment cases there have been numerous articles of impeachment. When the upper house votes on the impeachment, each article is voted on separately; it is possible for public officials to be convicted on some charges but not on others.
Sometimes, people introduce articles of impeachment as an act of protest or commentary. In this case, an official is well aware that she or he probably cannot attract enough votes to send the articles of impeachment to a higher house, but they are brought to the floor anyway. This gives officials an opportunity to air grievances and alert members of the public to wrongdoing on the part of elected officials. Such actions are usually reported on by the media and sometimes they attract wide coverage, especially if the legislator introducing the articles is media-savvy.
Mary McMahon
Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a WiseGEEK researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.
Learn more...
Mary McMahon
Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a WiseGEEK researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.
Learn more...AS FEATURED ON:
AS FEATURED ON:
-
![Man with hands on his hips]()
Man with hands on his hips
Discussion Comments
I wasn't alive at the time, but after reading about Watergate, I cannot understand why the articles of impeachment were not used to dismiss and put Richard Nixon on trial. I always thought he got off easy considering he was interfering with the election process.
@Animandel - The reasons Congress used the impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton can be found in the last paragraph of this article. That paragraph says that even though members of Congress know they have little chance of actually getting the person thrown out of office, they do have a chance to show that they don't approve of his actions.
As you said, Clinton and the intern were both of legal age, but he still took advantage of a young women who looked up to him, and he was able to do that because of the position he held. That's not the way the office should be use.
The final paragraph goes on to say that impeachment proceedings can alert the public to what an elected official is doing. I think that is good because then the voters are given the chance to decide if they want the person to represent them in the future.
Until certain members of congress decided to use the constitution to try to get rid of President Bill Clinton, impeachment wasn't a word many people were familiar with. I hadn't even thought about what impeachment was since we studied it in school.
Even though I wasn't the biggest Bill Clinton fan, I thought it was ridiculous that congress would use his relationship with an intern, who was legally an adult, to try to remove him from office.
Post your comments